We'd come to visit the Norman font. There's a drawing on this page of the WANHM journal but it doesn't really do the scallopyness around the bottom justice - it's a bit more complicated than that. I can appreciate it was difficult to draw though because mine isn't right either. There's a kind of double thing that should be going on. You can see much better on the photo on B's blog.
It's definitely been given a new round base since that drawing in the journal. The 'top base' (if that makes any sense at all) is definitely wonky, which of course I appreciate. There was also a little cross scratched in, and I think the round mark I've drawn was an indication of where the lock used to be. I'm starting to realise that the hacked-aboutness of a missing lock does at least affirm the great age of the font.
On another note, if there's something that really winds up my O.H., it's
place names that aren't pronounced the way you'd expect. According
to another ancient volume of the WANHM,
Etchilhampton is 'Ashelton'. That was 1867 though and perhaps things
are different now, who knows. There was a man mowing his lawn and I was
going to ask him about the clouds of mining bees that were inhabiting
the verge next to where we parked. But he didn't look like he wanted to talk to Strangers. I don't even think we look that dodgy.
No comments:
Post a Comment